What i am interested in all of these readings is that it is part of our human condition to adapt to this continuous change. In reference to Ranciere’s writing The Emancipated Spectator, a ‘viewer becomes an active participant as opposed to passive voyeur’ (Ranciere, J, 2009). It is only through this encounter that we begin to realize that a work can be independent and all the viewer needs is what lies before them not what is added through interpretation. The way in which Ranciere describes the viewers as a performer is also interesting as i am interested in the viewers movement around the work causing forms and shapes to appear and disappear on the muted surface of the paper.
Claire Bisphop write:
That "art should actively intervene in and provide a model for allowing viewers to be involved in the processes of production."
I don't see my art as an active performance with a subject mater and a rehearsed context, but as a subtle illusion that keeps the viewer moving and interested in the work as it is ever changing through light and layers. This become a sort of performance for the viewer as they may become determined to know more or see more. The viewer has a close engagement to the materials i am using and how they operate on paper, through their movement as layers from underneath the surface of paint begin to reveal themself as light hits the edges of the forms.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.